Saturday, February 25, 2017

Vatican Council II is one of the main ideological pillars of the Left and they are going to lose it now.Fifty years of confusion in the Church is finished.

Vatican Council II is one of the main ideological pillars of the Left and they are going to lose it now.Fifty years of confusion in the Church is finished.
Image result for Photo of John Allen JR. Crux
I asked John Allen at Crux what's his position on this issue.He says that they do not have any position. He obviously knows what I am saying. How can he honestly say that without the irrational premise Vatican Council II supports  extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite). It would be contrary to all his work for Satan. The Left, is from Satan.
SSPX AND ST.BENEDICT CENTERS
It was because of the irrational premise, which created the new theology- Cushingism, that the St. Benedict Centers  and the Society of St. Pius X( SSPX) were in opposition in the past.
Now it is known that it is the magisterium which has made the mistake.It is the magisterium which is irrational and in error.
RATZINGER,RAHNER,KUNG PREMISE
Without the irrational premise of Ratzinger, Rahner and Kung, Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It is traditional.It has the old ecclesiocentrism which is opposed by the Left.So out of obedience to 'the magisterium', the magisterium has made Catholics proclaim heresy in opposition to the Gospel of Jesus.
Those cardinals and bishops who supported Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) were never excommunicated. Now the heresy is wide spread in the Church, with the approval of the two popes.
They are still not affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) nor are they asking Catholics to do so.
TRADS PROTECTING THEIR BLOGS
Meanwhile traditionalists at Rorate Caeili and Fr.Z's blog act as if all is normal.They will not affirm or discuss Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Just as the SSPX accepted a personal prelature ( the  carrot) to avoid the anti-Semitism threat before them ( the stick) traditionalist bloggers protect their blogs as if it is all they have.
Image result for Photo of Ann Barnhardt
Ann Barnhardt a few days back removed a familiar line underscored in yellow.Only now she is assured of an Internet server.There is no more free speech on certain  leftist issues. Ann  prudently, or in ignorance interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism.
The Left does not really believe in the freedom of expression and belief.Satan will not tolerate it. Satan used those slogans on liberty  in the past to get his message across and consolidate error in the Catholic Church and society.
SHEPHERDS STILL ASLEEP
But now even though the shepherds in the Church are asleep, people know that there is an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus- and it is rational.
Discerning Catholics know that the present Vatican theology on Vatican Council II is false, a deception and based on fantasy and non reality.Fifty years of confusion is beginning to crumble and the liberals and Masons can no more use the Council as a reference for change.
PAST ECCLESIOCENTRISM ON OTHER RELIGIONS
Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) tells us all Jews are oriented to Hell, without 'faith and baptism'-unless of course Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) refers to known exceptions in 2017.Visible in the flesh people seen without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.Then the Council can be interpreted as saying not every one needs to enter the Church.
PAST ECCLESIOCENTRISM ON ECUMENISM
Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) indicates all non Catholics, without Catholic faith ( which include the Sacraments and the faith and moral teachings of the Church, according to Tradition) are on the way to Hell.Protestants, Orthodox Christians, Pentecostals and Jehovah's Witnesses are going to Hell, according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) - unless of course, LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc refer to objective cases in 2017 saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. Then they do not have to convert into the Church for salvation, they could be among the exceptions and we would have Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).The Council is interpreted with a different theology.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) has no exceptions and it is  harmony with the traditional, centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite)
MAGISTERIUM OF DOCUMENTS
The magisterium of Church documents in 2017, interpreted with Feeneyism,is in accord with the magisterium of the 16th century.This is the magisterium of the texts and not that of the popes and the people at the Vatican.It is not the magisterium of people in the present times,today. We have to make the distincition here.The magisterium of the texts, the magisterial documents,  is not in harmony with the Vatican Curia today in Rome, the magisterium of people.
So we have a choice. We are either faithful to the magisterium of the Church documents or the magisterium of the ecclesiastics at the Vatican in rebellion with Jesus and his one, true Church.
So when I say that I follow the present magisterium(which is a vague phrase) I mean the magisterium of the Church documents ( Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995 etc) in 2017 -and the magisterium of the Church documents ( of texts) and that of the hierarchy ( of persons, ecclesiastics) in the 16th century.
PRESENT MAGISTERIUM REJECTS MAGISTERIUM OF DOCUMENTS
I am not following the magisterium of the hierarchy in 2017 ( Vatican Curia) which has rejected the magisterium of the Church documents ( texts), interpreted with Feeneyism, and the magisterium of the past e.g of the 16th century or that of the Church Fathers.
Now we simply say Vatican Council II is Feeneyite!- and the magisterium of people at the Vatican in 2017 cannot respond.They have to pretend that I (Lionel) do not exist otherwise people may come to the truth which they hide.
They cannot deny what I say.
MAGISTERIUM OF CHURCH DOCUMENTS INTERPRETED WITH FEENEYISM
I affirm the magisterium of Church documents but interpreted with a different theology and I am in accord with the magisterium of the persons and Church documents of Tradition.
They interpret present day Church documents with Cushingism which is a rupture with the Church documents and magisterium of the people of the past, over the centuries.
I AFFIRM MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS BUT WITH FEENEYISM
So I am a Catholic who interprets magisterial documents with the theology and philosophy of Feeneyism and I reject the interpretation of magisterium documents with irrational Cushingism, by the Vatican Curia(the magisterium of people, Cushingites).
VATICAN CURIA NEEDS TO USE RATIONAL THEOLOGY
When they affirm magisterial documents with Feeneyism, instead of Cushingism, then we will be in harmony.
They have no answer.They cannot deny what I write here.They are irrational and are depending on a false innovation in the Church which is not really magisterial.It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective  mistake.
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: