Sunday, April 22, 2018

Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec cannot comment either way for or against and can get no help from the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican. They cannot show me where I am wrong and neither can they agree with me

Image result for Photo st. Paul on the road to damascus


Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec posted "Points of Rupture" of the Second Vatican Council II with the Tradition of the Church - a Synopsis ( April 13,2018. Blog 1Peter5) 1

Then I wrote that there was an error in six points in that Synopsis. They were clearly not a rupture with Tradition.While the other points were open to interpretation.
This is all new material on my blog for Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec.They cannot comment either way for or against.Maike Hickson can also get no help from the cardinals and bishops at the Vatican. 
Vatican Council II for me is in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the missionaries in the 16th century, the Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return.It is not a rupture with the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent.
Again. They cannot show me where I am wrong and neither can they agree with me.
If they refer to 'the official policy' on Vatican Council II of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) I would say the same observation and they would agree with me i.e "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".
So when they agree that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " how can Vatican Council II be a rupture with Tradition?
They were following the 'official policy' of the SSPX and the liberals, which is based on an irrational inference.
Every year they keep repeating the same view.It's Paolo Pascualucci, Romano Amero, Mons.Brunero Gherardino,  Bishop Bernard Fellay, Cardinals Kasper, Koch and Marx. They will not comment when I keep repeating "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " how can Vatican Council II be a rupture with Tradition?
For them to start thinking we probably need a lightening bolt from Heaven.-Lionel Andrades


1

 APRIL 14, 2018


This imporant point was overlooked by Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/this-imporant-point-was-overlooked.html

OnePeterFive
APRIL 15, 2018

Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html


APRIL 15, 2018


The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html

APRIL 18, 2018
Maike Hickson and Steve Skojec did not know that we can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/maike-hickson-and-steve-skojec-did-not.html


APRIL 17, 2018
We can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the SSPX priests in Italy, Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson so Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/we-can-affirm-hypothetical-and.html

APRIL 15, 2018
Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html

APRIL 15, 2018
Image result for Paolo Pasqualucci PhotosImage result for Romano Amerio PhotosImage result for Msgr. Brunero Gherardini  Photos
The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html

APRIL 14, 2018
Once this is understood we can always interpret Vatican Council II as affirming an ecumenism of return only
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/once-this-is-understood-we-can-always.html

JUNE 18, 2014
Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/cristina-siccardi-paolo-pasqualucci-use.html

APRIL 14, 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/liberals-would-protest-if-ferrara.html


 

 APRIL 9, 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/is-vatican-council-ii-rupture-with-eens.html
APRIL 5, 2018
Conferences must criticize the March 1 and 30th statements of Cardinals Ladaria and Nicols : affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, there are billions of non Catholics in Hell today.It is important to be a Catholic and to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/conferences-must-criticize-march-1-and.html
APRIL 4, 2018
Conference on Saturday will not criticize the March 1 and 30 statements of Cardinals Ladaria and Nicols and neither will they affirm the immutable truths on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/conference-on-saturday-will-not.htm
APRIL 4, 2018
There will be a false Profession of Faith at the Conference this Saturday in Rome http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-will-be-false-profession-of-faith.html
APRIL 5, 2018
St.Benedict Centers need to correct their position on Vatican Council II with reference to EENS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/stbenedict-centers-need-to-correct.html
____________________________________


APRIL 21, 2018



The solution to the doctrinal crisis is the Church announcing that there are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018 and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases


The solution to the doctrinal crisis is the Church announcing that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOT A RUPTURE WITH TRADITION
This would mean Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.Since hypothetical cases are not real people in the present times and so cannot be objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So the Magisterium made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and then repeated it at Vatican Council II. The mistake is repeated even today.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOT A RUPTURE WITH AN ECUMENISM OF RETURN
So when it is known that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I  in 2018and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases "Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

VATICAN COUNCIL II WOULD NOT CONTRADICT THE TEACHINGS ON THE SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
Since the old ecclesiology would be intact Vatican Council II would not contradict the teachings on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. It would be based on no salvation outside the Church.


NOTHING IN VATICAN COUNCIL II TO CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
There would be nothing in the Council text to contradict the Syllabus of Errors since "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".


THE PRIORITY IS THE NON SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
With Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the dogma EENS (Council of Florence 1441) indicating all non Catholics today who have died outside the Church are in Hell, the priority must be the non separation of Church and State, for the salvation of souls.

ALL NON CATHOLICS WITHOUT FAITH AND BAPTISM ARE IN HELL ACCORDING TO VATICAN COUNCIL II Vatican Council II (AG 7) would be telling us that all non Catholics  are on the way to Hell without faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , GS 22, etc to traditional EENS.Unknown and physically invisible non Catholics cannot be exceptions.
The exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II would be the same.


SSPX COULD INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION
The SSPX and all religious communities could affirm Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally, since it would be in harmony with the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return and outside the Church there is no salvation.Presently there is a rupture since they do not know that  "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".

CHRISTOLOGY NOT OPPOSED TO EXCLUSIVIST ECCLESIOLOGY
There would be no separation of Jesus from  membership in the Catholic Church for salvation by using the New Theology. There would not be a vague Christology opposed to an exclusivist  ecclesiology.

VATICAN COUNCIL II NO MORE CITES LIBERALS NEW ECUMENISM : FALSE PREMISE HAS TO BE USED
The liberals would no more be able to cite Vatican Council II to affirm the new ecumenism, since there would be no known salvation outside the Church for them.They would have to use the false premise and then they could cite UR 3, LG 8, AG 11, GS 22 etc.The liberals would not be able to call for a New Evangelisation alongside other Christians, joint mission, since outside the Church there is no salvation, according to Vatican Council II.

OTHER CHRISTIANS ARE ORIENTED TO HELL ACCORDING TO THE OLD THEOLOGY NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II
Other Christians are oriented to Hell according to the Old Theology which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II. All non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Church as members and remain within it, according to the Old Theology which avoided the false premise.

INTER FAITH MARRIAGE IS ADULTERY ACCORDING TO EENS WHICH IS NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II
Catholics who marry non Catholics would be living in adultery since civil marriages are not a Sacrament and the non Catholic spouse is outside the Church and on the way to Hell.

PROFESSION OF FAITH MUST AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS
Those who make an Oath of Fidelity or a Profession of Faith or an Oath Against Modernism would have to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted rationally and and also the Nicene Creed interpreted rationally.It would be saying I believe in one baptism of the forgivness of sins, one known baptism and not three known baptisms.

RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF NICENE CREED
It would be saying I believe in the Holy Catholic Church which teaches outside the Church there is no salvation and nor the possibility of salvation( SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012).
The Nicene  Creed would also be saying I believe in the Holy Spirit which teaches the Catholic today as in centuries past that there are no objective and known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.


CDF PREFECTS MUST AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II,. EENS, SYLLABUS OF ERRORS AND OTHER DE FIDE DOCTRINE TO HOLD OFFICE ACCORDING TO CANON LAW
A cardinal cannot be the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith according to Canon Law if he does not affirm Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors. Similarly if popes make the same error they would be in mortal sin and would have to recant and go for Confession.Lionel Andrades




 APRIL 21, 2018



The St.Benedict Centers need to clarify that there are no practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus for us in 2018. No physically visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I in the past http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-stbenedict-centers-need-to-clarify.html






 APRIL 21, 2018



So for every one who is a part of this confusion, it is important for the SBC to clarify that the baptism of water is always needed for justification and salvation (John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc) and there are no practical exceptions to EENS for us in 2018. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/so-for-every-one-who-is-part-of-this.html



APRIL 21, 2018


Fr.Chad Ripperger and FSSP priests still not permitted by the Vatican to affirm the traditional teaching on salvation : positivism towards magisterialism  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/frchad-ripperger-and-fssp-priests-still.html